
Corelli: Violin Sonatas Op 5 No 7-12 / Fernandez, Wilson
CORELLI Violin Sonatas, op. 5: No. 7 in d; No. 8 in e; No. 9 in A; No. 10 in F; No. 11 in E; No. 12 in d, âLa folliaâ ⢠François Fernandez (vn); Glen Wilson (hpd) (period instruments) ⢠NAXOS 8.557799 (62:53)
François Fernandez and Glen Wilsonâs readings of the last six sonatas of Corelliâs op. 5 make up the second of a two-disc set (the first issued by Naxos as 8.557165). Harpsichordist Glen Wilson has provided the notes, in which he discusses the style of ornamentation, the use of harpsichord alone in realizing the figured bass, and the choice of A=400 (at which pitch Fernandezâs 1690 Andrea Guarneri violin, hardly so viola-like as might be expected, retains a surprising edgeâof course, Corelli, like many of his contemporaries, avoided more than occasional use of the G string, supposedly because the bulkier string responded more sluggishly, so the higher tessitura doesnât focus so intently on the instrumentâs lower registers). Corelliâs sonatas influenced not only his contemporaries and immediate followers, but generations to come, and Fernandez and Wilsonâs performances should make them equally impressive to modern listeners as wellânot because of modern instruments or reliance on astringent timbres, but simply because they make these works breathe with a similar vital force as they must have exhibited in their own time. Even in these sonatas da camera the bass counterpoint should hold the most hidebound polyphonistâs attention, yet the melodies flow liquidly in the slow movements and they leap with sprightly, though controlled, energy in the fast ones. In the Ninth Sonata, Fernandez plays, on repeats, the ornaments provided by Corelliâs student, Geminiani, available in Hawkinsâs History of Music (elsewhere, they try to remain true to the spirit of models that Roger claimed Corelli himself provided. Geminianiâs âornaments,â as Wilson notes, amount almost to recompositionâheavy handed ones, in fact, some might think, in the spirit of Geminianiâs reworkings of Corelliâs solo sonatas as concerti grossi). Throughout, Wilson and Fernandez tease the textures of these worksâwhich could alternatively be played with a noble (deadly?) restraint as inviolable masterpiecesâwith textural highlights, strong underscoring of the signature sequential passages, and zesty tempos. In Fernandez and Wilsonâs performance, the famous âFolliaâ blends a somewhat melancholy dignity with the noted technical brilliance that made it a model for virtuosic showpieces through the generations. In this joie de vivre the duo seems to be having a thumpingly good time, as did Andrew Manze in so many pieces. Yet, with Corelliâs sonatas, Manze (Harmonia Mundi 907298, 26:5), with period instruments, wove sensitive, seductive fantasies. In 20:3, I reviewed John Hollowayâs more abruptly rhetorical set, on period instruments (Novalis 150-128). And I also like Elizabeth Wallfischâs set with the Locatelli Trio on Hyperion 66391, which Nils Anderson reviewed in 14:4.
Although Fernandez draws a somewhat reedy, acerbic sound from his violin, sound never seems an end in itself, nor does he rely upon it as a means to any other kind of end than a purely musical one. The engineers have balanced the harpsichord and violin almost perfectly; the ambiance remains clear and light. These performances constitute both an irrefutable argument for Corelliâs predominance and an irresistible introduction to his Ĺuvre . In the last analysis, the choice between Manze, Holloway, and Fernandez depends more on the listenerâs aesthetic predilections rather than on any superior merit. They are all authoritative in their very different ways. Fernandez belongs in this august company. Urgently recommended.
FANFARE: Robert Maxham
CORELLI Violin Sonatas, op. 5: No. 7 in d; No. 8 in e; No. 9 in A; No. 10 in F; No. 11 in E; No. 12 in d, âLa folliaâ ⢠François Fernandez (vn); Glen Wilson (hpd) (period instruments) ⢠NAXOS 8.557799 (62:53)
François Fernandez and Glen Wilsonâs readings of the last six sonatas of Corelliâs op. 5 make up the second of a two-disc set (the first issued by Naxos as 8.557165). Harpsichordist Glen Wilson has provided the notes, in which he discusses the style of ornamentation, the use of harpsichord alone in realizing the figured bass, and the choice of A=400 (at which pitch Fernandezâs 1690 Andrea Guarneri violin, hardly so viola-like as might be expected, retains a surprising edgeâof course, Corelli, like many of his contemporaries, avoided more than occasional use of the G string, supposedly because the bulkier string responded more sluggishly, so the higher tessitura doesnât focus so intently on the instrumentâs lower registers). Corelliâs sonatas influenced not only his contemporaries and immediate followers, but generations to come, and Fernandez and Wilsonâs performances should make them equally impressive to modern listeners as wellânot because of modern instruments or reliance on astringent timbres, but simply because they make these works breathe with a similar vital force as they must have exhibited in their own time. Even in these sonatas da camera the bass counterpoint should hold the most hidebound polyphonistâs attention, yet the melodies flow liquidly in the slow movements and they leap with sprightly, though controlled, energy in the fast ones. In the Ninth Sonata, Fernandez plays, on repeats, the ornaments provided by Corelliâs student, Geminiani, available in Hawkinsâs History of Music (elsewhere, they try to remain true to the spirit of models that Roger claimed Corelli himself provided. Geminianiâs âornaments,â as Wilson notes, amount almost to recompositionâheavy handed ones, in fact, some might think, in the spirit of Geminianiâs reworkings of Corelliâs solo sonatas as concerti grossi). Throughout, Wilson and Fernandez tease the textures of these worksâwhich could alternatively be played with a noble (deadly?) restraint as inviolable masterpiecesâwith textural highlights, strong underscoring of the signature sequential passages, and zesty tempos. In Fernandez and Wilsonâs performance, the famous âFolliaâ blends a somewhat melancholy dignity with the noted technical brilliance that made it a model for virtuosic showpieces through the generations. In this joie de vivre the duo seems to be having a thumpingly good time, as did Andrew Manze in so many pieces. Yet, with Corelliâs sonatas, Manze (Harmonia Mundi 907298, 26:5), with period instruments, wove sensitive, seductive fantasies. In 20:3, I reviewed John Hollowayâs more abruptly rhetorical set, on period instruments (Novalis 150-128). And I also like Elizabeth Wallfischâs set with the Locatelli Trio on Hyperion 66391, which Nils Anderson reviewed in 14:4.
Although Fernandez draws a somewhat reedy, acerbic sound from his violin, sound never seems an end in itself, nor does he rely upon it as a means to any other kind of end than a purely musical one. The engineers have balanced the harpsichord and violin almost perfectly; the ambiance remains clear and light. These performances constitute both an irrefutable argument for Corelliâs predominance and an irresistible introduction to his Ĺuvre . In the last analysis, the choice between Manze, Holloway, and Fernandez depends more on the listenerâs aesthetic predilections rather than on any superior merit. They are all authoritative in their very different ways. Fernandez belongs in this august company. Urgently recommended.
FANFARE: Robert Maxham
Original: $19.99
-65%$19.99
$7.00Description
CORELLI Violin Sonatas, op. 5: No. 7 in d; No. 8 in e; No. 9 in A; No. 10 in F; No. 11 in E; No. 12 in d, âLa folliaâ ⢠François Fernandez (vn); Glen Wilson (hpd) (period instruments) ⢠NAXOS 8.557799 (62:53)
François Fernandez and Glen Wilsonâs readings of the last six sonatas of Corelliâs op. 5 make up the second of a two-disc set (the first issued by Naxos as 8.557165). Harpsichordist Glen Wilson has provided the notes, in which he discusses the style of ornamentation, the use of harpsichord alone in realizing the figured bass, and the choice of A=400 (at which pitch Fernandezâs 1690 Andrea Guarneri violin, hardly so viola-like as might be expected, retains a surprising edgeâof course, Corelli, like many of his contemporaries, avoided more than occasional use of the G string, supposedly because the bulkier string responded more sluggishly, so the higher tessitura doesnât focus so intently on the instrumentâs lower registers). Corelliâs sonatas influenced not only his contemporaries and immediate followers, but generations to come, and Fernandez and Wilsonâs performances should make them equally impressive to modern listeners as wellânot because of modern instruments or reliance on astringent timbres, but simply because they make these works breathe with a similar vital force as they must have exhibited in their own time. Even in these sonatas da camera the bass counterpoint should hold the most hidebound polyphonistâs attention, yet the melodies flow liquidly in the slow movements and they leap with sprightly, though controlled, energy in the fast ones. In the Ninth Sonata, Fernandez plays, on repeats, the ornaments provided by Corelliâs student, Geminiani, available in Hawkinsâs History of Music (elsewhere, they try to remain true to the spirit of models that Roger claimed Corelli himself provided. Geminianiâs âornaments,â as Wilson notes, amount almost to recompositionâheavy handed ones, in fact, some might think, in the spirit of Geminianiâs reworkings of Corelliâs solo sonatas as concerti grossi). Throughout, Wilson and Fernandez tease the textures of these worksâwhich could alternatively be played with a noble (deadly?) restraint as inviolable masterpiecesâwith textural highlights, strong underscoring of the signature sequential passages, and zesty tempos. In Fernandez and Wilsonâs performance, the famous âFolliaâ blends a somewhat melancholy dignity with the noted technical brilliance that made it a model for virtuosic showpieces through the generations. In this joie de vivre the duo seems to be having a thumpingly good time, as did Andrew Manze in so many pieces. Yet, with Corelliâs sonatas, Manze (Harmonia Mundi 907298, 26:5), with period instruments, wove sensitive, seductive fantasies. In 20:3, I reviewed John Hollowayâs more abruptly rhetorical set, on period instruments (Novalis 150-128). And I also like Elizabeth Wallfischâs set with the Locatelli Trio on Hyperion 66391, which Nils Anderson reviewed in 14:4.
Although Fernandez draws a somewhat reedy, acerbic sound from his violin, sound never seems an end in itself, nor does he rely upon it as a means to any other kind of end than a purely musical one. The engineers have balanced the harpsichord and violin almost perfectly; the ambiance remains clear and light. These performances constitute both an irrefutable argument for Corelliâs predominance and an irresistible introduction to his Ĺuvre . In the last analysis, the choice between Manze, Holloway, and Fernandez depends more on the listenerâs aesthetic predilections rather than on any superior merit. They are all authoritative in their very different ways. Fernandez belongs in this august company. Urgently recommended.
FANFARE: Robert Maxham





















