đ Up to 70% Off Selected ItemsShop Sale

Schumann: Hermann & Dorothea Overture; Overture, Scherzo & Finale; Violin Concerto
SCHUMANN Hermann and Dorothea Overture, Op. 136. Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, Op. 52. Violin Concerto in d, WoO 1 1 & ⢠Stewart Robertson, cond; Elmar Oliveira (vn); Atlantic Classical O ⢠ARTEK 0059 (79:08) Live: Boca Raton, FL 3/5/2012
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins
SCHUMANN Hermann and Dorothea Overture, Op. 136. Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, Op. 52. Violin Concerto in d, WoO 1 1 & ⢠Stewart Robertson, cond; Elmar Oliveira (vn); Atlantic Classical O ⢠ARTEK 0059 (79:08) Live: Boca Raton, FL 3/5/2012
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins
$14.99
Schumann: Hermann & Dorothea Overture; Overture, Scherzo & Finale; Violin Concertoâ
$14.99
Description
SCHUMANN Hermann and Dorothea Overture, Op. 136. Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, Op. 52. Violin Concerto in d, WoO 1 1 & ⢠Stewart Robertson, cond; Elmar Oliveira (vn); Atlantic Classical O ⢠ARTEK 0059 (79:08) Live: Boca Raton, FL 3/5/2012
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins
& A conversation on the Schumann Violin Concerto with Elmar Oliveira and Stewart Robertson
In March of last year, a Boca Raton, Florida, audience was treated to this unusual all-Schumann programâunusual in that the works performed are not that often heard on record let alone live in concert. The highlight was Schumannâs ill-fated Violin Concerto, about which Iâve already had my say in the above interview. I first came to know the piece from Henryk Szeryngâs Mercury recording with Antal DorĂĄti conducting the London Symphony Orchestra. That recording, coupled with Szeryngâs Mendelssohn Concerto was made in 1964, and I acquired it as an LP. I didnât think much of the Schumann concerto then, and after a parade of others that followedâincluding Thomas Zehetmair, Joshua Bell, and Christian TetzlaffâI still donât think much of the piece now. Or, I didnât, until I heard Elmar Oliveira play it on this CD. I wasnât just trying to flatter him in our interview when I said I found his performance of the work the most persuasive Iâve heard.
I think there are some artists who play a piece for the same reason that some mountaineers climb a particular mountainâbecause itâs there. Then there are those artists who really believe in a piece and commit themselves to it body, mind, and soul in an effort to bring it to life in a way that no one else has before. I canât, and wonât, say that Iâm ready to accord Schumannâs violin concerto a place on high among the Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, and Sibelius concertos, but I can, and will, say that Oliveira, Robertson, and the ACOâs performance of the score made more sense to me than it ever has, and has convinced me that the work deserves at least second-tier status among the likes of the Dvo?ĂĄk, Glazunov, Goldmark, and Bruch concertosâand thatâs not bad company to be in. Itâs certainly several steps above where Schumannâs concerto has long languished, and Oliveira and Robertson can take credit for its rehabilitation.
Schumann composed a trivet of concert overtures based on literary works. I use the word âtrivetâ rather than trilogy, because though the three scores were composed in the same year, 1851, they are not related, and they were assigned non-contiguous opus numbers. The first of them, Braut von Messina , op. 100, is based on Schillerâs tragic play of the same name. The second overture, Julius Caesar , op. 128, was inspired by Shakespeareâs tragedy. And last, the overture performed here, Hermann and Dorothea , op. 136, was inspired by Goetheâs epic poem telling of the tragic fate of two lovers during the French Revolution. Tchaikovsky, it seems, was not the first composer to use the Marseillaise when he incorporated it into his 1812 Overture ; Schumann uses it here to set the time and place for his score. In works such as these, the lines between concert overture and tone poem are blurred. The question is not merely academic: If an orchestral piece of music takes its inspiration from a literary work, and it purports to depict the workâs characters and/or to outline its story, how does that differ from a tone poem?
Itâs a question that spills over into the other orchestral work on this program, the Overture, Scherzo, and Finale, op. 52. What is its musical taxonomy? Even Schumann didnât seem to know, at one time referring to it as his âSymphony No. 2,â at another time as a âsuite,â and at still another time as a âsinfonietta.â Reducing it to its component parts, one could say itâs a symphony without a slow movement. Perhaps because of confusion over its classification, the work was long neglected for most of the 19th century, but it has been dusted off in the 20th and taken up by a number of famous conductors in the modern recording era, from Kletzki, Schuricht, and Konwitschny, to Karajan, Solti, Sawallisch, Marriner, Gardiner, and Thielemann.
The two orchestral works are presented in highly polished performances by conductor Robertson and the Atlantic Classical Orchestra, but of course, itâs Schumannâs violin concerto with soloist Oliveira that is the main fare on the menu and the reason for you to purchase this disc. As mentioned earlier, a 20-minute bonus track at the end includes a fascinating conversation on the concerto between Oliveira and Robertson.
FANFARE: Jerry Dubins











